Skip to main content

Vladimir Putin’s Prophesies Keep Coming True

By
Sometimes it’s interesting to re-visit statements by Vladimir Putin that warned of upcoming events, which almost always turned out to be right. His interview from June 4, 2014 is no exception

On June 4, 2014 Vladimir Putin was interviewed on Radio Europe 1 and Channel TF1. Kiev’s "anti-terrorist operation" in the Donbass had been going on for two months, a Normandy Four meeting was two days away, and Poroshenko’s inauguration was three days away. The Syrian blitzkrieg and Minsk accords were a long way off.

Warning to Poroshenko: halt Kiev’s anti-terrorist operation and start negotiations with the Donbass


Poroshenko, who as yet had no blood on his hands, had a unique chance to halt the punitive operation and start a dialogue with the people of southeastern Ukraine.

The interview took place on June 4, 2014, almost three months before the defeat of Ukrainian troops near the city of Ilovaisk and eight months before the Debaltsevo disaster. Unfortunately, Poroshenko didn’t seize the chance, and as a result, the Minsk Accords in which the global community ordered Ukraine to begin a direct dialogue with the Lugansk and Donetsk People’s Republics, were signed in February 2015.

Warning to NATO:


Russia Has a modern, efficient military, and we plan to rearm it based on advanced technology, reducing quantity and improving quality. Our rearmament program was not adopted yesterday, or in response to the Ukrainian crisis, and we will continue to implement it.

NATO and the Pentagon ignored Putin’s words spoken more than a year before the Russian Air Force came to Syria. Now they’re probably sorry.

Warning to Europe: Expect Terrorist Attacks
We are mostly worried that a wrong action could turn Syria into another Afghanistan, an uncontrollable spawning ground for terrorists, and all the terrorists operating there now would move to other countries, including in Europe. Europe neglected this warning.

 Watching the video the interviewers appear to dismiss Putin’s warning.

Warning to the USA: We Will Come To Syria
We very much fear that Syria will follow in the footsteps of Iraq or Afghanistan. That’s why we would like the legal authority to remain in Syria, to cooperate with the government and our partners in Europe and the United States while considering how to modernize the regime and make Syrian society more viable. On June 4, 2014 no one understood that Putin was broadcasting his plan to the world. Neither the USA, nor Europe took the warning seriously. However Putin’s words, “the Syrian people will decide on the future of Syria themselves” are quoted almost word for word in the United Nations Security Council resolution 2254 (2015) adopted on December 18, 2015, more than a year and a half after the meeting with the journalists of Europe 1 and TF1. He also announced joint moves with the USA beforehand, and the start of the ceasefire was announced in the US – Russia Joint Statement on February 22, 2015.

The conclusion is simple: world leaders need to listen attentively to the Russian President from now on, preferably, with a laptop, so they can take notes. Then they need to learn several paragraphs by heart, even if their meaning is not clear.

If they do, the world will probably become a safer place.
Labels:

Comments

  1. Andrei NechaevSeptember 8, 2016 at 12:53 AM

    nice blog)
    please visit mine too
    http://max-aschmann-park.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Russia: Let's Improve Baltic Air Safety! NATO: No Thanks, We'll Pass

By
NATO has rejected air-safety proposals made by Russia which would have ensured all military planes flying in the Baltic region would operate with their transponders switched on. This makes no sense. According to the Wall Street Journal, NATO officials said the proposals “would do little to improve” air safety — a strange response, given that NATO has repeatedly scolded Russia for allegedly flying its military jets over the Baltic with transponders switched off. Headlines about ‘dangerous’ and ‘unsafe’ Russian military flights have been ten-a-penny over the last couple of years. Such stories have become so ubiquitous — and the media so obsessed with blowing them out of proportion — that at one point a woman in Cornwall became convinced that she saw Russian bombers overhead one day when she was out for a driving lesson. One would imagine then, given NATO’s repeated criticisms and concerns over safety in the Baltic region, that they would have welcomed any kind of common-sense prop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Clinton Versus Trump on War with Russia

By
The biggest difference between the two major-Party U.S. Presidential candidates is that Hillary Clinton wants to continue the Obama-Administration’s policy of regime-change in nations that aren’t hostile towards Russia (such as Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and now Syria), and that Donald Trump doesn’t. Trump wants to focus U.S. national-security policies instead upon eliminating jihadists (a problem that the U.S. and Saudi governments actually gave birth to in Pakistan and Afghanistan starting in 1979, in order to cripple the Soviet Union — which ended in 1991). Trump says that the Cold War is over , but Hillary says «Russia must pay a price». However, neither candidate has provided any fleshed-out position on the matter. Hillary Clinton doesn’t need to do so, because she has already shown by her actions in public office, that she has consistently favored overthrowing heads-of-state who were either neutral or else downright friendly toward Russia, of which there have been four cases that...
Post a Comment
Read more

Obama Vetoes 9/11 Bill, Defends Saudi Arabia from Lawsuits

By
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama has vetoed a bill that would have allowed the families of 9/11 victims to sue the government of Saudi Arabia. The move sets Obama up for a possible first veto override by Congress. Both chambers passed the bill by voice vote. The House sent Obama the bill just before the 15th anniversary of the attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania on Sept. 11, 2001. Obama says the bill would “upset longstanding international principles regarding sovereign immunity.” The bill would have given 9/11 families the right to sue in U.S. court for any role that elements of the Saudi government may have played in the attacks. Fifteen of the 19 men who carried out the attacks were Saudi nationals.
Post a Comment
Read more