Skip to main content

FBI: Hillary’s Crooked Aide and Lawyer Cheryl Mills Destroyed Evidence

By
According to the recently released FBI report on Hillary’s server investigation, the FBI found evidence that Hillary’s crooked aide and lawyer Cheryl Mills destroyed evidence and committed obstruction of justice. Despite the evidence, the FBI has done absolutely nothing.
In an interview with the New York Post, Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton said the FBI saw massive document destruction and intent to withhold material evidence by Cheryl Mills, but did nothing and ignored the evidence and even let Mills sit in on Hillary’s interview as one of Hillary’s lawyers. Mills ultimately decided which emails of Hillary’s were “personal” and which were “work-related.”
“The smoking gun is on page 16 of the FBI’s 47-page report. It details how Mills ultimately made the determinations about which emails should be preserved before she and Clinton decided to delete the rest as “personal.” Paul Sperry writes.
“It’s absolutely outrageous, the FBI saw massive document destruction and clear intent to withhold material evidence,” he added, “and they just ignored that obstruction, and even let her sit in on the interview. The FBI invited Mills to attend Hillary’s interview at FBI headquarters as one of her lawyers. – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. Fitton also brought up the Clinton Foundation pay-to-play scandal at the State Department –“The whole thing was designed to keep Clinton Foundation emails away from investigators,” – Fitton said.

In addition, Hillary ordered aides to strip classified material and send it insecure to her private server. A direct example of deliberate negligence and willful intent. Hillary also burned her calendar and daily schedules (public records) illegally – admitted by her aide Huma Abdeen during her own deposition early on in the FBI investigation of Hillary’s server.The fix was in for Hillary’s email investigation, as her top aide Cheryl Mills was involved in the whole email scandal fiasco by helping Hillary delete emails was also allowed to sit it as her interview as one of her lawyers – something that should have been seen as a major conflict of interest to the case by the DOJ. Instead the DOJ protected Mills and others from being prosecuted or even questioned.Mills’s also has claimed she was unaware of the nature of Clinton’s email setup during Hillary’s tenure as Secretary of State despite documents showing that Mills was deeply involved as chief of staff in resolving questions regarding Clinton’s email use. So Cheryl Mills not only committed obstruction of justice but she lied to the FBI to protect her boss Hillary Clinton and the FBI did nothing.
Federal criminal law states 18 U.S.C. 207(a) makes it a crime for any former government employee to communicate with the government on certain matters “in which the person participated personally and substantially while in government.”
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Russia: Let's Improve Baltic Air Safety! NATO: No Thanks, We'll Pass

By
NATO has rejected air-safety proposals made by Russia which would have ensured all military planes flying in the Baltic region would operate with their transponders switched on. This makes no sense. According to the Wall Street Journal, NATO officials said the proposals “would do little to improve” air safety — a strange response, given that NATO has repeatedly scolded Russia for allegedly flying its military jets over the Baltic with transponders switched off. Headlines about ‘dangerous’ and ‘unsafe’ Russian military flights have been ten-a-penny over the last couple of years. Such stories have become so ubiquitous — and the media so obsessed with blowing them out of proportion — that at one point a woman in Cornwall became convinced that she saw Russian bombers overhead one day when she was out for a driving lesson. One would imagine then, given NATO’s repeated criticisms and concerns over safety in the Baltic region, that they would have welcomed any kind of common-sense prop...
Post a Comment
Read more

Clinton Versus Trump on War with Russia

By
The biggest difference between the two major-Party U.S. Presidential candidates is that Hillary Clinton wants to continue the Obama-Administration’s policy of regime-change in nations that aren’t hostile towards Russia (such as Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and now Syria), and that Donald Trump doesn’t. Trump wants to focus U.S. national-security policies instead upon eliminating jihadists (a problem that the U.S. and Saudi governments actually gave birth to in Pakistan and Afghanistan starting in 1979, in order to cripple the Soviet Union — which ended in 1991). Trump says that the Cold War is over , but Hillary says «Russia must pay a price». However, neither candidate has provided any fleshed-out position on the matter. Hillary Clinton doesn’t need to do so, because she has already shown by her actions in public office, that she has consistently favored overthrowing heads-of-state who were either neutral or else downright friendly toward Russia, of which there have been four cases that...
Post a Comment
Read more

Obama Vetoes 9/11 Bill, Defends Saudi Arabia from Lawsuits

By
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama has vetoed a bill that would have allowed the families of 9/11 victims to sue the government of Saudi Arabia. The move sets Obama up for a possible first veto override by Congress. Both chambers passed the bill by voice vote. The House sent Obama the bill just before the 15th anniversary of the attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania on Sept. 11, 2001. Obama says the bill would “upset longstanding international principles regarding sovereign immunity.” The bill would have given 9/11 families the right to sue in U.S. court for any role that elements of the Saudi government may have played in the attacks. Fifteen of the 19 men who carried out the attacks were Saudi nationals.
Post a Comment
Read more