Skip to main content

FBI: Hillary’s Crooked Aide and Lawyer Cheryl Mills Destroyed Evidence

According to the recently released FBI report on Hillary’s server investigation, the FBI found evidence that Hillary’s crooked aide and lawyer Cheryl Mills destroyed evidence and committed obstruction of justice. Despite the evidence, the FBI has done absolutely nothing.
In an interview with the New York Post, Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton said the FBI saw massive document destruction and intent to withhold material evidence by Cheryl Mills, but did nothing and ignored the evidence and even let Mills sit in on Hillary’s interview as one of Hillary’s lawyers. Mills ultimately decided which emails of Hillary’s were “personal” and which were “work-related.”
“The smoking gun is on page 16 of the FBI’s 47-page report. It details how Mills ultimately made the determinations about which emails should be preserved before she and Clinton decided to delete the rest as “personal.” Paul Sperry writes.
“It’s absolutely outrageous, the FBI saw massive document destruction and clear intent to withhold material evidence,” he added, “and they just ignored that obstruction, and even let her sit in on the interview. The FBI invited Mills to attend Hillary’s interview at FBI headquarters as one of her lawyers. – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. Fitton also brought up the Clinton Foundation pay-to-play scandal at the State Department –“The whole thing was designed to keep Clinton Foundation emails away from investigators,” – Fitton said.

In addition, Hillary ordered aides to strip classified material and send it insecure to her private server. A direct example of deliberate negligence and willful intent. Hillary also burned her calendar and daily schedules (public records) illegally – admitted by her aide Huma Abdeen during her own deposition early on in the FBI investigation of Hillary’s server.The fix was in for Hillary’s email investigation, as her top aide Cheryl Mills was involved in the whole email scandal fiasco by helping Hillary delete emails was also allowed to sit it as her interview as one of her lawyers – something that should have been seen as a major conflict of interest to the case by the DOJ. Instead the DOJ protected Mills and others from being prosecuted or even questioned.Mills’s also has claimed she was unaware of the nature of Clinton’s email setup during Hillary’s tenure as Secretary of State despite documents showing that Mills was deeply involved as chief of staff in resolving questions regarding Clinton’s email use. So Cheryl Mills not only committed obstruction of justice but she lied to the FBI to protect her boss Hillary Clinton and the FBI did nothing.
Federal criminal law states 18 U.S.C. 207(a) makes it a crime for any former government employee to communicate with the government on certain matters “in which the person participated personally and substantially while in government.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bill Gates Is No Longer The World’s Richest Person, This Man Is

mancio Ortega, the founder of the clothing line Zara, has replaced Bill Gates as the world’s richest person. Ortega and Gates switched the top position in a matter of a few minutes. Currently, Ortega is ahead with a net worth of $78 billion. The road to becoming the world’s richest person is full of ups and downs. The last few days have witnessed two billionaires going through those ups and downs to sit on the throne and become the world’s richest person. One the of them is Bill Gates, a name synonymous to the title “World’s Richest Person”. The second one is the co-founder of Zara retail clothing line, Amancio Ortega, whose dramatic stock performance made him climb the world’s billionaires list leaving behind Gates, Buffett, Bezos, and Zuckerberg in the below positions. Zara’s parent company Inditex’s 2.5% rise on Wednesday made Ortega surpass Bill Gates to become the richest man. The shares dropped by 2.8% on Friday, Ortega fell on to the second position and Gates took the lead

Clinton Versus Trump on War with Russia

The biggest difference between the two major-Party U.S. Presidential candidates is that Hillary Clinton wants to continue the Obama-Administration’s policy of regime-change in nations that aren’t hostile towards Russia (such as Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and now Syria), and that Donald Trump doesn’t. Trump wants to focus U.S. national-security policies instead upon eliminating jihadists (a problem that the U.S. and Saudi governments actually gave birth to in Pakistan and Afghanistan starting in 1979, in order to cripple the Soviet Union — which ended in 1991). Trump says that the Cold War is over , but Hillary says «Russia must pay a price». However, neither candidate has provided any fleshed-out position on the matter. Hillary Clinton doesn’t need to do so, because she has already shown by her actions in public office, that she has consistently favored overthrowing heads-of-state who were either neutral or else downright friendly toward Russia, of which there have been four cases that